Would there be an AndhraState in 1953 had Madrasis forced in the name of SamaikyaMadras(Madras state) ?.

Introduction

Madras state existed prior to 1953,current seemandhra region of AP,tamilnadu and some regions of karnataka and kerala were part of it.

Andhra separated from Madras state seeking a state for telugu speaking people providing reasons like self respect,discrimination and selfrule to all telugus(andhrites) during that separate state campaign,potti sriramulu fought for andhra state by fasting for more than 50 days,like kcr did for telangana(11 days).

What if had there been a movement demanding for united dravidian state, forcing andhrites to stay united in madras state prior to 1953?

what if had they demanded a single state for all the dravidians that is all south indians,arguing govt can save money on multiple chief ministers and several other portfolios,there by govt spending could be saved on these politicians in a big way.

What if had they argued some selfish,unemployed politicians,even people like potti sriramulu started separatist movements to make sure that their family enjoys the power in new states.

what if had they came up with estimated statistics of like irrigation,education and

percaptia income in the combined state of samaikyamadras like loksatta JPN bought some misleading statistics of telangana(attributing natural growth interms of % increase),and also advising people instead of having states lets have district governments giving power to districts(JP's idea of saying no to telangana).

What if had they argued that dividing states by language would lead to more than 200 new states(since we have more than 200 languages spoken by 1 million or more people) in india,which would be a threat to national integration,and chances of increase in number of terrorits or naxalites would be very high.

like currently few ignorant seemandhrites arguing dividing states by whatever reason telanganites attribute(selfrespect,selfrule,culture and development) will lead to 100 new states,which would be a threat to national integration,and chances of increase in number of terrorits or naxalites would be very high.

Would there be a teluguthalli,had madrasis forced seemadhrites in the name of dravidathalli to stay united?

Many telanganites are believing madrasis should have done something like what few seemandhrites are doing now in the name of samaikyandhra.Atleast then seemandhra samaikyavadis would understand the pain and agony of T's when few seemandhrites argue illogically about the telangana in the name of samaikyandhra(a violent way of forcing people to stay united,like hitler forcing other european countries during ww2).

Note:

When i say few seemandhrites,i mean only and only those who are opposing telangana with baseless arguments,many seemandhrites are not opposing since they know having a state for them would be an advantage for them interms of infrastructure devlopment and ease of governence,i just wanted to convey a simple message to readers,we can have any number of states as long as those states are economically sustainable and people of that state desire,telangana is very much economically sustainable and people of telangana strongly wish for it,in such case one should not put invalid sentiments,like one language one state,one religion one state,one caste on state, etc..smaller states often provide better governence.